Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

Research Guide for SSCI 100 Anthropology and Psychology

Proseminar: Introduction to Graduate Studies in Anthropology and Psychology

Evaluating Sources

Consider the following criteria to evaluate your sources. 

  • Currency: Is the publication date appropriate for your topic?
  • Relevance: Who is the intended audience and does the information help answer your question?
  • Authority: Do the author credentials, organizational affiliation, and publisher indicate expertise?
  • Accuracy: Is the information reliable and supported by evidence or peer-review?
  • Purpose: Does the information exist as fact, opinion, propaganda, or bias?
  • More tips on source evaluation:


What does "peer-reviewed" and "scholarly" articles mean?

  • Peer-reviewed articles are approved by other scholars through a specific process: Authors submit their articles to a peer-reviewed journal and then the journal editor sends it to other experts in the field to review the article and provide feedback to the editor. The peer-reviewers and editor may decide the article does not meet standards for publication, or they might ask the authors to make revisions. If the articl eventually meets all standards it will be published in the journal.